A key Big Oil talking point against increasing their taxes is that it would affect average Americans.
The Washington Post reports:
Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Tex.) said that “politicians are shooting at Big Oil but hitting Americans” in their wallets.
But supporters of the House tax bill pushed back strongly against this argument yesterday after passing the bill. First, they correctly argued that these tax rollbacks would hardly affect Big Oil bottom lines:
But hours after crude oil hit a new high of $102 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, most lawmakers said they saw no reason why the oil industry couldn’t pay an additional $1.8 billion a year in taxes over the next 10 years.
“We don’t think it’s asking too much to ask them to assist in a partnership to help find out whether there’s a better way to meet our energy needs,” said Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. He called the money raised from the oil giants “grains of sand on the beach.”
Second, they pointed out how little these tax changes would affect the average consumer–by a maximum one cent per gallon:
Supporters of the measure noted that rescinded tax breaks would amount to less than 2 percent of the profits of the five biggest oil companies. Even if the companies were to pass along that entire cost to gasoline consumers, it would amount to about a penny a gallon.
In contrast with companies like Exxon and Shell, emerging renewable energy companies–especially those within the wind and solar industries–desperately need tax breaks to survive.
According to a report done by the solar and wind lobby, letting the renewable energy tax credits expire would mean the loss of 116,000 jobs and $19 billion worth of investment. Learn more from the full report here.
